Flat Bimetallic Strip Aluminum Riveted To Iron

Bruno, the last Italian to Tripoli, which stands guard our dead

by: Fausto Biloslavo

The caretaker of the cemetery where lie 6,500 Italians resisted well to the expulsion of 1970: "And I will not go even now"

Tripoli - The Sheltering Sky with Gaddafi American bombs in the bunker of the colonel, the revolt against the regime are just some of the adventures of Bruno Dalmasso, one of the last Italian Tripoli. At 77 years, with a blue cap and the four stars of Italy's world champion, Dalmasso welcomed us to the cemetery, which is the custodian, which houses the remains of the 6499 nationals. A small oasis in the Libyan capital, where young patriots rest massacred by the Ottomans, princesses of the past and common people from the colonial period to today. In a crypt remains intact the historic plaque in the air marshal "Italo Balbo Quadrumvirate Governor General of Libya." Shot down, officially by mistake, "in the sky Tobruch 06/28/1940," as stated on the white marble.

Dalmasso was born in Bordighera, but loves to remember that he was "conceived in Eritrea 'to colonial times. In East Africa we would stay forever if Mengistu Haile Mariam, had not taken power in a coup. "I knew him well, but it's water under the bridge," said Dalmasso, that it was from the Abyssinian dictator in person has caught a hail of kicks, after being thrown in jail because Eritrean wire and then sent back to Italy. Dalmasso resists in Italy two months and the pain of Africa led him to Libya to head a construction site in Bengum, the antechamber of 'hell in the desert: "The Libyans call it" the place of the wind "and there are still remains a strong Italian in 1913. " One day there comes a young officer at the wheel of a Beetle. "It was Colonel Gaddafi - Libya says the veteran of the-We got to get a chai (tea) in the desert. He was young, jovial, laughing. I think that his country has done a lot. I saw as Libya has grown and developed. " Dalmasso and speaks It is as if the story ran. In 1986, when U.S. President Ronald Reagan ordered the bombing of Qaddafi's reign he lives 600 meters from the Bab Aziza, the fortified citadel of Colonel in the heart of Tripoli. "On 15 April, at two o'clock at night, squadrons came from the sea. The sky was red for the anti-aircraft tracers - Dalmasso remembers - The first bombs burned the house of Abu Nidal (the principal Palestinian terrorist from the 1985 massacre of Fiumicino and other bloody attacks nda). Then came the bunker Gaddafi. "A single bomb, said a ton, has fallen down like a bang followed by a roar and a strong light, like a giant flash in the dark the night. " In those years Dalmasso often goes to the cemetery, half left after the expulsion of the Italians in 1970, to read the tombstones buried by weeds. The place is called Hammangi, which means turkish bath. With his partner Ethiopian Abersah tegu Mari, she begins to revive and categorize countrymen buried in Tripoli and the rest of Libya. The remains of 28 thousand soldiers and Gaddafi did not want, including 5 thousand Eritrean askari who fought on our side, were transferred to the shrine of Bari military overseas

For his efforts he was named Knight Dalmasso of the Republic and even in the days of the revolt left the Italian cemetery: "With the graves helped us the Egyptian laborers, but they fled when the rebellion began, regrets the fellow-On February 17, the consulate has advised us to stay close at home, but nobody expected such an uprising. " Even Dalmasso, like many of the Libyan capital, is angry with the media: "When I heard that they were bombing the center of the capital, I took a shot: I went in the car right where there should have been the massacre, but there was one sign of the intervention plane. It was a lie. " In the days of the revolt in Tripoli, the Libyan friends 'stock' in the cemetery.

His plate has the number 15, the Italians and some rowdy could throw stones. "You are right Mr Maroni: the Americans are out - blurts Dalmasso - If NATO or the United States there is a risk involved another Afghanistan. They have to resolve among Libyans. Basically no one agrees secession, with the gas and oil to the west to the east. " The avalanche danger is real immigration: "There are hundreds of thousands of African immigrants fleeing Libya with the lure of Italy." Dalmasso with a stick between the graves. The remains of the 6499 Italian rest in niches divided by letter of the alphabet with a number engraved on the marble. The number corresponds to the name shown on large transparent plates on the wall. Quaglio Maria, Patanè Bruno, Country Carmela says discovering that the first Italian merchants in this slice of Africa in 1831 were buried. Gaston Land was a patriot anti turkish than twenty years' massacred by the Ottomans June 21, 1908. Earlier, in 1879, Princess De Zenaide Goyzueta, daughter of the Marquis of Toverena died just 10 years, 3 months and 20 days. His father, a Neapolitan nobleman, was consul of King Umberto I of Italy. The mother's name Livia Rimsky-Korsakov, sister of the great Russian composer. Balbo's body was reported at home and buried in Orbetello, but Tripoli is jealously guards the plaque. The last grave is Italian in 2008. On the white marble reads: Anna Buzzi, Milan. From the history of the cemetery italianosalta out an incredible story, that of an Italian Hannibal the cannibal, because it never identified with other fellow cast, which used human flesh in sausages. In the crypt of the chapel is also buried Innocent Halima, a nun who was the first Muslim. The regime has done to raise the Christ of the great iron crocein entrance to the cemetery because it hits the Islamic beliefs.

Dalmasso had the opportunity to leave Libya in revolt in 1400 with the evacuation of other nationals. "I said no. Libya is my country - he explains - I have accepted and respected for 36 years. Does not seem right to abandon the Libyans in time of danger. If the situation precipitated will share their fate. In 77 years I am not afraid of anything. " www.faustobiloslavo.eu

#5.0.0 Smtp; 554 Transaction Failed

A dictator to eliminate nuclear

by: Paul Visnoviz - zonadifrontiera.or g

can deprive you of everything except the earth.
The earth is the only thing without which you can not do anything.
If you destroy other things you could fix it, but beware of destroying the earth, because then you will lose everything! (Muammar Gaddafi)

There are balls. I speak of Libya. Everybody says this is a fight for the freedom of the people and information deployed on the left is excited about this flurry of action in defense of a democracy that might be. Obama said "the Libyans are to be protected" and Sarkozy wasted no time and unleashed the jet.

Americans are beginning to launch long-range cruise missiles from ships.

long time since the national and international press has begun to create a vacuum around Gaddafi portraying him as a ferocious and bloodthirsty tyrant. But have you ever seen evidence of these alleged mass murder? No, there are none. Aljazeera has played its cards well. Since the beginning of the protests and clashes first told of massacres, concluding that there were up to 10 thousand victims. They showed us empty holes in the sand, pretending to be mass graves. But no one could control: there were no other journalists in the country.

Later, when I arrived international press had to admit - with some embarrassment - that the dead would have been maybe 400. Maybe. No one has ever even seen them. Colonel's fault that destroyed the graves, burned the bodies, all covered up, he said. Maybe. Now the image of a bloody-Gheddaffi went well and was printed in the collective imagination.

All against Gaddafi, the tyrant. True, no doubt a dictator, but for years he had abandoned the path of terrorism. Lockerbie has been a terrible stain on his resume, but in subsequent years is straight lined and no one has ever even accused of subversive fringe finance. Indeed, Libya has always held out by the winds of fundamentalism.

rais of Libya was a country where there was freedom of religion, there was no gender difference and the girls happily load into the school as well as berber, discriminated against elsewhere. (For "berber" I mean all descendants of indigenous peoples, not necessarily Libya, prior to the Islamisation: Tuareg Garamantes, Bedouins, Kabila, etc.. It is therefore incorrect that the distinction is often made between Berbers and Tuaregs in the newspapers.) Gaddafi has been campaigning for a nomadic people of the desert were not susceptible to the borders in the Sahara, being able to cross it in all its sands without bothering to find out in which country they were.

A dictator who dreamed of direct democracy, the "regime of the masses", the Jamāhīriyya. His book, Green is a mixture of socialism and pan-Arabism with deep Muslim influences. He has always chased the dream of making Africa a continent united and strong, with sometimes questionable methods and outcomes, getting enemies near and far, but certainly not with the concentration camps.

If the Gaddafi regime was so awful and so terrible conditions of the population, is very curious, there are the rest of the world's refugees and immigrants Libyans. Migrants have always come by us from Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt and even from the Sudan, Eritrea, Senegal, Chad, Niger, etc., but never from Libya. Even now, a war going on, who runs away from Libya are immigrants. Yes, millions of immigrants from Egypt, the Sudan, Chad and even from Bangladesh had come to this country to work. Millions of idiots who were going to get into the hands of a bloodthirsty tyrant.

There are balls, again. And our government has behaved in an unworthy manner, rejecting a policy that, effort, but with success, he had shown at the center of the Mediterranean. We have betrayed a partner which until recently we have sworn friendship, stabbed in the back. We acted like Italy at the usual stuttering, incapable of the courage of an independent foreign policy. The only one who had the courage to stand was Bossi. All the others follow like sheep and applaud the military invasion of a sovereign country, even more demanding tasks.

I do not think a leader barricaded in his bunker, defended by a handful of loyalists. The opposite is true, most of the population is with him, always has been. And others, inside and outside, will follow him now that he's got an external enemy, the hated infidel dog who comes to desecrate the sacred soil of Islam.

I hope the great Western strategists know what they're doing, so why risk Libya split in two, with the danger of the situation fester for a long time to come. No one will to liquidate the Rais, less than a ground attack by American-European-Arab coalition. Certainly will not be those handful of disorganized insurgents to remove the chestnuts from the fire to the West.

But if the situation does not unlock in a short time the Russians might decide to help Gaddafi and this could form an alliance with Alqaeda dall'accerchiamento to exit. If the situation does not resolve in a few days Expect, and unpredictable outcomes in the medium to long term, a resurgence of terrorism.

Nhatquanglan1.0catch.com

: That is why Italy can not stop

to: Roberto Preatoni - Affairs Italiani.it

receive from a reader and commentator on technology issues to publish this article order to contribute to the debate on nuclear power, which of course is open to all

I decided to write this article conscious of exposing myself to public ridicule to make clear the sea of \u200b\u200binaccuracies and scientific nonsense that I read in the last days on the nuclear issue. I make a
Abstract: This article is very long because the issue in question requires a more than exhaustive. The fact is that while respecting the right that everyone has to accept or reject a technology such as nuclear, I am convinced it is necessary to correctly inform the consciences of voters back home.

The nuclear debate these days is getting more heated, especially in the beautiful country where, alas, soon we are going to vote for a referendum on nuclear power. And this (I say unfortunately) just behind the tsunami triggered by the facts of emotional Japan.

First we make a point: the nuclear vote against the referendum does not mean to vote against the existing nuclear power plants in the first and second generation (which does not exist in Italy).

vote against the nuclear means vote against the deployment of a technology to exploit the power of 'atom which is based on principles of operation totally different from those implemented in older plants. The old plants would remain in operation, with all the dangers (but are scarce even in this case) resulting therefrom. not make the mistake of thinking that the referendum would remove the central that the French have built around us . You know how many? Many, many, more than you can imagine. Look at the chart at the bottom of this report: http://www.world-nuclear.org/education/uran.htm

The referendum so it goes against the old central and the possible dangers they represent, (ricordatevelo!) but runs counter to the implementation of third-and fourth-generation power plants, built for example for the Auto-off reaction in the event of a nuclear accident.

What does this mean? It means that in the old central (The Japanese for instance), once triggered the nuclear reaction in fissile material, all that man can do is try to "keep it at bay" , suppressing the reaction with various tricks. In the case of 'accident such as Chernobyl, the nuclear core is beyond human control for a variety of reasons (mainly due to errors in the interpretation of the parameters of core cooling) and then the disaster we all know.

The central third or better in the fourth generation are different from the principle of operation. The core is designed with the tendency to switch off. To keep it running requires continuous human intervention . In case of failure or disaster, the unit switches off without any problems and there is no way that can escape supervision. Then it works just the opposite: if the human operator or cooling systems work, then the nuclear reaction takes place. If they lack the proper functioning of any party control that are around the reactor (mechanical or human), the reactor is turned off. No bang, no radioactive cloud, no nuclear holocaust.

If Italy were a serious country, the referendum on nuclear power, given the importance of the topic, would be accompanied by a panel discussion broadcast on unified networks, where experts in the field have the opportunity to respond live without fear of contradiction to the concerns of the more outlandish theories as to the holocaust . Theories as well as being the fault of weird people to find accommodation in the mouth of some of our politicians. say the mouth and not in the head because if you think that Italian politicians are of the moral caliber to actually say what they think, will make the rich illusions . They ride the wave one and only election, in order to pursue its short-term interests in the expense of long-term interests of the whole Italian population. I do not think of having to prove anything in this regard.

An 'other information that eludes most is the nature of "clean" plants of the fourth generation. It means that these new power plants burn more than 90% of the fissile fuel. What else? Means high efficiency, but also means a flood less waste. Indeed ZERO waste. At this point one might say that while burning 90% of nuclear fuel, a 4th generation nuclear power still produces 10% of slag ( http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/spring01/reactors.html ).

True, but waste are different. The waste of the old plants, employing about 10,000 years to lose radioactivity. The waste of the new central clerical only 200 years to become harmless. Two hundred years on a geological scale, but also are a human blink of an eye and their management would be immensely easier of the old wastes.
But there is something else that people are not aware. Those who say NO to the new generation of nuclear power plants on 'emotional wave of preserving the environment for the benefit of their children, do not know that nuclear plants would help 4 ^ enus paradoxically to consume nuclear waste produced by old plants, solving a longstanding problem.

But as I personally am for or against nuclear power? In principle I do not like the system because it relies on the consumption of nonrenewable resources. But since the world does not work on principle but on practical facts, I prefer to be pragmatic. Today nuclear power is the only source of supply of energy capable of meeting the present demands for energy (which continue to grow). And renewables? Great thing, you will come to use those one day but not today. For the simple reason that all put together would not be able to provide even half 's energy demands our lifestyle. careful, I'm talking about available technologies and not on paper prototypes whose implementation is far from 'be immediate.

then analyze them, but making the effort to analyze them in an all-Italian, just because the arguments are, in principle, only smoke.

WIND ENERGY FEASIBILITY 'GEOGRAPHICAL : Italy' s not the Netherlands or Denmark. We certainly windy, but the Italian territory is not suitable in its entirety. The noise of the blades is annoying at night.
FEASIBILITY 'POLICY : the average Italian has a short memory. He has forgotten that the first opposition against the implementation of wind turbines in Italy were in fact the Greens and the leaders of the LAV.
The Greens said that because maintenance requirements of the blades requiring the construction of service roads of concrete in areas maybe included in natural parks (I never understood why they had immediately rejected the idea of \u200b\u200bthem unpaved). Those of LAV because wind turbines actually sometimes slice some pigeon. Always to remember the mentality of 'average Italian, the'
Italy is the country that has decided to oppose the construction the bridge over the Strait of Messina, Sicily, preferring to maintain in a state of decay rather than disturb the phases of '
pair of anchovies.
COST-CAPACITY A ' PRODUCTION: poor, very poor. A shovel large can at best supply of energy to get to a neighborhood.
GREEN FACTOR: high, once produced the blades remain in office, without polluting for a long time

HYDROPOWER FEASIBILITY 'GEOGRAPHICAL : High: Italy is full of rivers and valleys. But to produce all the electricity we need the hydro we fill all our rivers and our valleys of concrete dams. FEASIBILITY
'POLICY: The dam is good as a solution at all, except the inhabitants of the towns nearby. It does not have a point because in the case of structural failure, for example due to an earthquake, flood wave generated by the collapse of the dam would wipe everything and everyone. Remember the tragedy of Vajont? http://www.vajont.net/ COST-CAPACITY 'PRODUCTION : high. Hydroelectric power plants cost a lot but are able to remain in operation for more than one hundred years GREEN FACTOR: the environmental impact of a dam is devastating. Entire valleys are processed, all the surrounding fauna and flora are eliminated.

SOLAR :
FEASIBILITY 'GEOGRAPHICAL : good, especially in central and southern Italy.
Beware, Messina is not the Sahara!
FEASIBILITY 'POLICY : high, so the panels will pay citizens COST PRODUCTION CAPACITY : very little. A solar panel is unable to produce even 100% of 'hot water necessary for a household with 4 people. Nor is it able to produce electricity enough. The concept is great but until the efficiency average of a panel is around 15% conversion of light into energy, the spread will be low, given the costs quite high (despite the incentives, which are taken for a ride, because the money always come from the state our pockets).
GREEN FACTOR: Medium. Once installed last on average only 15-20 years and should be replaced with new panels, whose cost is productive in terms of ecological balance are high.

tidal :
FEASIBILITY 'GEOGRAPHICAL : Nothing, Italy does not have the kind of large tides needed to political feasibility work that technology, but please! In 30 years we have been able to finish installing the MOSE in Venice ...
COST-CAPACITY 'PRODUCTION : good, if we had the tide of New Zealand.
GREEN FACTOR: Medium, maintenance is expensive and would be carried forward with motor vehicles

BIOFUELS:
FEASIBILITY 'GEOGRAPHICAL : good, Italy is a land eminently agricultural FEASIBILITY POLICY: nothing. Our farmers take to the streets to protest the shooting manure milk quotas, let alone what they would do if forced to re-crop.
COST-CAPACITY 'PRODUCTION : no one has yet understood GREEN FACTOR: medium, bio fuels create less pollution, but polluting.

ZERO POINT ENERGY / ENERGY FEASIBILITY OVERRUN 'GEOGRAPHICAL : high, Italy is the perfect country, full of suckers ready to believe the first scientific nonsense.
FEASIBILITY 'POLICY : even higher. Italian politicians to mastellianamente happy while his constituents would be able to allocate public funds for research in this sense, knowing that they are throwing money into the wind.
COST-CAPACITY 'PRODUCTION : nothing. is a hoax. It can not work because with today's technologies we are able to extract large amounts of energy from the zero point (bubbling quantum).
The same scientists also disagree on how much energy we could possibly escape the cosmic void.
GREEN FACTOR: high. Not working hard and does not pollute much. Perfect for some gullible people of my acquaintance.

Also, if we were to build installations that use all these forms of alternative energy we would still be able to support the national energy requirements . But remember this when you go to vote!

To explain the paradox of nuclear power in general I use the comparison with the trains. It is now considered the most efficient and environmentally friendly on the planet. And with good reason. But people forget that before the current drive superefficenti (such as red arrow), the locomotives were diesel. And those were the first locomotives that burn coal and pollute a lot, probably killing most of the atom.
Yet no one in the civilized world today would dream of banning the new generation of locomotives (except in Italy, where Greens prefer to stop the construction of tunnels for high speed, maintaining the status quo of a congested road network by road diesel trucks). Why in the world with nuclear
you can not use the same attitude?

Finally, a question that no one bothers to do more:
which is the social cost of not being independent from the energy point of view? The response we give it its the Japanese entered the war on December 7, 1941 because their oil supplies were running out. Were folded with a nuclear bomb American and yet, they learned their lesson and are endowed immediately NPP, to avoid having to do a 'last war for the provisioning of energy.

One note: the accident of the central Fukushima not a defeat but a victory of nuclear power. The fact is that people tend to forget decontextualise the incident happened on an island that houses a total of 55 nuclear power plants first generation (40 years old) suffered a massive earthquake and tsunami devastated by a ratio of Bible. HOWEVER not yet been any nuclear holocaust. Do I have to give credit to this discussion to 'excellent Oscar Giannino.

course, there is a third way and is that of reducing consumption. Me and my wife has a 'hybrid car. Yet when I drive the hybrid, I can get on roads extrraurbane 3.3 liters per 100 km while my companion did not fall below 6.5 liters per 100 km.
Yet we drive the same car. The difference is that I pay attention to how I drive, she did not.
She is also one that leaves the lamp on his bedside constantly lit, even during the day and while away from home. I'm running around all the time for the whole family off the lights they leave on.

They are all intelligent people in my house but look at me as if I were an alien. The truth is that anyone interested in making today half step back.

Yet it would be enough to put a minimum of attention to reduce our consumption to 40% without having to dramatically change our way of life.

And this is perhaps the most immediate response to all our questions.